“You’re
something the Catholic Church fears: a thinking Catholic.”
Those words were uttered to me by a
priest once, a million years ago, when I was in my 20s.
No this is not a blast on
Catholicism, or even a blog about religion. It’s more of a “Huh?” about the
modern world.
To put the statement in context, I
used to sing and play guitar for our parish’s guitar Mass. Every year, the
group had a picnic at a park about an hour from where we lived. I always found
that odd, since there were parks closer to home, it was usually a hot day, and
there was no place at the park to swim. We would invite the priests, but they
usually didn’t come.
One year, one of the
priests, who liked our group’s music, decided to go to the picnic. He didn’t
know how to get there, and I didn’t have a car, so he offered to drive me there
since I could show him the way.
Along the way we chatted about
miscellaneous and sundry things, and at one point got into a conversation about
that day’s gospel, which was the one about the rich man giving his money to
three of his servants and telling them to take care of it until he returned.
Two of the servants invested the money, which I considered a risky thing to do
with someone else’s money. They were lucky they didn’t lose everything, and
they were rewarded for making extra money for him, which, in my opinion, he had
no reason to expect. The third did exactly what he was told to do, and buried
the money, giving the man back exactly the amount he was given, exactly, to my
mind, all that the man should have expected back. And that servant was
punished. I thought that was grossly unfair.
Yes, yes, I understand the point
that the money --“Talents” -- was a metaphor for one’s talent in life, but taking
it on face value, the parable is unjust.
When I pointed out that one of the
men investing the money should have suffered losses, since that was a real
world situation -- just as having talent in an area, but life situations
preventing it from being used -- he told me I was putting 20th
century values -- this happened back then -- on the gospel. Quite the “Huh?”
moment.
Of course, I felt that if it wasn’t
relevant to the century we’re living in, what’s the point, anyway? And then he
said what I quoted at the beginning of the blog.
I apparently don’t pick up the
undercurrents of things people tell me. Perhaps that’s why I don’t understand
the world I find myself living in.
For example, when I was a wee, small child, my mother told me that we shouldn’t judge people by their race, religion, gender, ethnic background, and by extension, sexual orientation, we should look at the individual, and decide by their values and behavior whether or not we wanted them as friends.
I took that to heart to such an extent that sometimes, if
someone else mentions someone race, religion, gender, ethnic background
or sexual orientation, I have to stop and think, “Really? I never
noticed.”
This is not to say my mother didn’t
have her own prejudices; she did, and I recognized them when I was much older.
However, when I was in seventh
grade, my teacher, who was a nun, started a conversation with my class about a
movie that had just come out, Guess Who’s
Coming to Dinner, which 1) we were not old enough to see, since it had an R
rating, and 2) involved bi-racial dating, something that was apparently taboo
at the time. After telling us the premise of the movie, she asked us -- 12 and
13-year-olds, who were too young to be allowed to date -- if we would date
someone of a different race. Keep in mind, this was an all-white school in an
all-white suburb in the late 1960s.
I listened with increasing disgust
as my classmates said they would, but their parents wouldn’t let them -- always
blame someone else -- and very few were brave enough to admit they would never
consider it. The hypocrisy was overwhelming.
I finally raised my hand and told
the good sister that I wouldn’t have a problem with it, and told her what my
mother had taught me. Sister was apparently pleased at my parents’
forward-thinking ideals. I was proud of myself and my family.
But when I arrived home, my mother
was less than proud of me when I told her about what happened in school.
“You said WHAT???!!”
Another “Huh?” moment.
Apparently, what I was taught at
home was a state secret, because, if discovered, what would the neighbors think? My mother, it seemed, was afraid of
my classmates’ parents thinking ill of my family because of what I had said. I
didn’t think it was memorable enough for them to tell their parents.
My thinking was that people should
be happy to see that someone was living according to what Jesus was telling us
in church every Sunday. Sigh. I just didn’t get it.
Flash forward to today.
I used to feel safe going into
Philadelphia. However, with the uptick in gun violence, I don’t have it on my
radar as a place to go.
“Oh, you don’t have to worry. That
only happens in the neighborhoods,” people often tell me. And while that’s
somewhat true, “The neighborhoods” is racist code for certain parts of the
city. However, at least two deaths and a couple of other shootings in Dilworth
Plaza, which is part of City Hall’s footprint, the very epicenter of Center
City, puts the lie to the idea that shootings only happen in “the
neighborhoods.”
And people wonder why I think
they’re ridiculous telling me I’m brave to travel to Europe alone? I feel safe
in London; not so much in Philadelphia.
So it was a real shock on my latest
visit to the UK when I heard that someone had been shot and killed -- randomly -- in Wallasey, near Liverpool. Add to that the fact that, when I heard about the
shooting, I was visiting a cousin in Wallasey, and it had only happened a few
days earlier.
Beyond the sadness that this had
happened, especially since it had happened on Christmas Eve, was my first
thought: where did someone in England get a handgun? That was also the first
thing I was asked by my friends at home when I told them about the incident.
I live in a country that, sadly,
has reached the point that gun violence on a daily basis is almost expected.
But the Wallasey shooting was yet another “Huh?” moment.
Back in America, I think something
needs to be done about the violence, although, given our laws and the people
who think anyone who doesn’t own a gun is a radical looking to take away their
guns, I don’t know what we can do about it or how to even start. (Don’t get me
started on guns. If you really want to know, check out my previous blog, “The
Not So Okay Corral,” Aug, 2018.)
It’s sad to think I have to go to
another country to have a good day out.
That’s not to say I’d go to just
any other country. There are several I don’t care to go to, either because
they’re such crowded places, or because of their political regimes.
For example, although I’ve been to
Russia in better times, I wouldn’t go there again as long as their current
leader is in power. That means I’ll probably not be able to go there again in
my lifetime.
New Zealand, on the other hand, is
definitely on my list of must-see places.
I love to travel and meet people different from myself, but I can’t always do so, which means I need to stay in my own country sometimes. And I do realize that other countries have their own problems, some of them the same situations we have here. I know that some situations I’ve seen reported on television are almost world-wide, and it saddens me, mainly because it demonstrates that humans largely haven’t learned from the past.
The other day I saw a report on
someone being attacked solely for being Jewish. My immediate response was,
“What is wrong with people?” (ask Blue Scream of Jeff – read his blogs –and he
can tell you. He was there when I said it.) I feel the same when someone is
attacked for being Black.
Every time I hear about a Jewish
group being attacked, I ask myself if we’re living in 1930s Germany or Russia,
and if not, why we’re still not
better than that. Ditto for blacks, women and LGBTQ+ people.
Every time I hear about “ethnic”
groups being attacked in countries around the world, I think about the fact that
those same countries have been through this before. Why haven’t they learned
from it yet?
To quote a song by the Manic Street Preachers, "If you tolerate this, your children will be next."
We seem to be going backwards, too
far backwards.
I’m a child of the ‘60s. Peace, love and understanding -- and by the way, some fantastic music!-- We protested against war. We protested against injustice. We marched for civil rights.
If we’re
going to go backwards, let’s go back to those ideals, not the wild west, or the
ethnic cleansing of the 1930s and ‘40s, or even the so-called Communist purging
of the 1950s. I was raised with the ideal of eradicating bigotry as far as
possible. I was educated in schools that emphasized social justice.
Although I wasn’t a member of Girl
Scouts, they have a basic rule that you leave a place better than the way you
found it. I’ve always tried to be that person. Or, to quote Maya Angelou, “When
you know better, you do better.”
1 comment:
Aanother wellthought essay
Post a Comment